top of page

Choosing the Financial Statement Level That Supports Your Construction Company’s Growth

Writer: BryMar Crew
BryMar Crew
Aug 10
6 min read


Four construction workers in yellow vests and hard hats stand on a white background with text about growing a construction company. @BryMarCPA

Compilation, Review, or Financial Statement Audit? 

You’ve spent years building your construction company. Your backlog is growing, larger projects are within reach, and then your bonding agent tells you: 


“For the program you’re looking at, we’re going to need reviewed financial statements.” 


For many contractors, that’s the first time the difference between a compilation, review, and audit becomes more than an accounting conversation. 


It becomes a growth conversation. 


The level of financial statements your company has can affect how a surety evaluates your business and, ultimately, the bonding capacity available to pursue larger projects. That’s why the right question isn’t necessarily, “Do we need an audit?” 


It’s: “What level of financial reporting supports where our construction company is headed next?” 


Why Your Financial Statement Level Matters to Your Surety 

Construction is different from many other industries. 


A profitable year doesn’t tell the whole story. Sureties also want to understand your working capital, equity, backlog, job performance, cash flow, underbilling's and overbillings, and whether your financial reporting consistently reflects what is happening across the business. 


The level of CPA involvement in your financial statements gives the surety a different degree of confidence in that information. 


Compilation 

In a compilation, a CPA assists in presenting management’s financial information in financial statement form but does not provide assurance on those financial statements. 


For some contractors with smaller or less complex bonding needs, a compilation may satisfy the surety’s requirements. 


However, as your company grows, takes on larger contracts, or seeks additional bonding capacity, your surety may want a higher level of assurance. 


Review 

A review provides limited assurance. 


The CPA performs analytical procedures and makes inquiries to the management team to determine whether they are aware of any material modifications that should be made for the financial statements to conform with the applicable financial reporting framework. 


For many growing construction companies, this can become an important step as bonding needs increase. 


Audit 

An audit provides reasonable assurance and includes more extensive procedures, including obtaining and evaluating audit evidence and testing information supporting the financial statements. 


Audited financial statements may be required for larger or more complex organizations and bonding programs, but an audit isn’t automatically “better” simply because it provides a higher level of assurance. 


The appropriate level depends on what your company needs. 


Think Beyond the Next Bid 

One of the biggest mistakes we see construction companies make is treating the financial statement conversation as something to address only when a bonding agent asks for something different. 


By then, the clock may already be ticking. 


Imagine your company currently has compiled financial statements. A significant project comes across your desk, and your surety tells you the additional bonding capacity will require reviewed statements. 


Now you’re trying to coordinate a CPA engagement while simultaneously estimating the project, managing existing jobs, updating your work-in-progress (WIP) schedule, gathering financial information, and meeting a bid deadline. 


That’s not where you want to be. 


If leadership expects the company to pursue larger projects over the next 12 to 24 months, your financial reporting should be part of that growth planning before the opportunity arrives. 


Your Surety Is Looking Beyond the Bottom Line 

Construction owners understandably focus on revenue and profitability. 

Your surety is looking deeper. 


Two contractors can report similar revenue and net income and still have very different bonding profiles. 


Why, because underwriting typically considers factors such as: 

  • Working capital and liquidity 

  • Tangible net worth 

  • Backlog and project concentration 

  • Underbilling's and overbillings 

  • Accounts receivable aging and collectability 

  • Related-party balances 

  • Historical profitability 

  • Equity trends 

  • Job performance 

  • Financial reporting quality and consistency 


The details behind the balance sheet matter. 


For example, a contractor may report strong working capital, but a surety may make adjustments for items it considers less available or less liquid for underwriting purposes. Significant related-party receivables, older receivables, or certain underbilling's may not receive the same consideration as cash or readily collectible trade receivables. 


That’s why knowing your reported working capital is only part of the picture. 

Leadership should also understand what is driving it. 


Your WIP Schedule Tells a Story 

For construction companies, the work-in-progress WIP schedule is one of the most important pieces of financial information leadership has. 


It can tell you much more than whether a job is overbilled or underbilled. 


A strong WIP process can help leadership identify: 

  • Jobs experiencing margin fade 

  • Significant or growing underbillings 

  • Projects that may be experiencing collection or performance issues 

  • Changes in estimated costs to complete 

  • Concentration in a handful of large projects 

  • Differences between operational expectations and financial results 


These issues matter internally, and they may also influence the questions your CPA and surety ask. 


If your WIP schedule is something the team scrambles to clean up once a year for the CPA, that’s worth addressing. 


For growing contractors, WIP should be a management tool, not simply a year-end accounting exercise. 


Five Signs It May Be Time to Revisit Your Financial Statement Level 

1. You’re pursuing larger projects. 

If your average contract size is increasing, talk with your bonding agent before assuming your current financial statement level will continue to support your needs. 


2. Your backlog is growing quickly. 

Growth can be exciting, but more backlog also requires more working capital, stronger project oversight, and reliable financial information. 


3. Your surety is asking more questions. 

More detailed requests about WIP, receivables, cash flow, equity, or specific projects may be a sign that the complexity of your bonding program is changing. 


4. You’re planning significant growth in the next year or two. 

Don’t wait until the larger opportunity is sitting in front of you. Find out what your surety expects before you need the additional capacity. 


5. Your accounting processes haven’t grown with the company. 

A contractor can grow from $10 million to $30 million or $50 million in revenue faster than its accounting processes mature. 


More jobs, more project managers, more change orders, and more complex billing can expose weaknesses that weren’t significant at a smaller size. 


A move to reviewed or audited financial statements may require more preparation than leadership initially expects. 


Where Contractors Can Get Caught Off Guard 

The issue usually isn’t that management chose the “wrong” financial statement. 

It’s that the conversation happened too late. 


Common examples include: 

  • Waiting for the bid opportunity. Moving from a compilation to a review—or from a review to an audit—takes planning. Waiting until a major opportunity is on the table can create unnecessary pressure. 


  • Focusing on revenue instead of financial strength. A bigger top line doesn’t automatically translate into greater bonding capacity. Liquidity, working capital, equity, profitability, and the quality of the backlog matter too. 


  • Ignoring underbillings until year-end. Significant underbillings deserve management attention throughout the year, particularly when they are concentrated in a few projects or continue growing. 


  • Assuming an audit is always the next step. More assurance also means more extensive procedures, time, and cost. If a review satisfies the needs of your surety and other financial statement users, an audit may not provide additional business value simply because it is a higher level of service. 


  • Keeping your CPA and bonding agent in separate conversations. Your CPA determines the appropriate procedures and reporting for the engagement, while your bonding agent and surety determine what they require for underwriting. Management benefits from understanding both sides early. 


  • What Construction Leadership Can Do Now. You don’t need to wait until year-end to start planning. 


Ask your bonding agent what level of financial statements they expect for the bonding program your company anticipates needing over the next one to two years, not just today. 


Then look internally. 


Is your monthly close timely? Is your WIP schedule reliable? Are project managers updating estimated costs to complete consistently? Are underbillings being investigated? Does leadership understand changes in gross margin by job? Can your team easily produce the documentation supporting major balance sheet accounts? 


Those questions matter whether your next step is a compilation, review, or audit. 

The goal isn’t simply to satisfy a financial reporting requirement. 


It’s to make sure your financial reporting infrastructure is keeping pace with the company you’re building. 


How BryMar Works with Construction Companies 

At BryMar, we understand that financial statement engagements don’t happen in a vacuum. 


For construction companies, they intersect with bonding relationships, project opportunities, banking requirements, growth plans, and the day-to-day realities of running jobs. 


Our role is to perform independent compilation, review, or audit services at the appropriate level for your company while helping management understand what the engagement requires and what to expect throughout the process. 


Management remains responsible for the company’s financial statements, accounting decisions, internal controls, and business strategy. That independence matters—especially when a surety, lender, or other outside party is relying on our report. 


What we can provide is a clear, well-planned engagement and an experienced construction-focused perspective so your team isn’t discovering requirements for the first time when a major opportunity is already on the table. 


Plan for the Contractor You’re Becoming 

Your financial statement level shouldn’t be determined solely by where your construction company is today. 


It should also account for where you’re trying to go. 


If larger projects, additional bonding capacity, or significant growth are part of your next 12 to 24 months, now is the time to talk with your bonding agent and CPA. 


Talk with the BryMar team before the next big bid hits your desk. We can help you understand what a compilation, review, or audit involves and plan an independent financial statement engagement that aligns with the requirements your company is facing. 


Sources & Further Reading 

 

bottom of page